2 ms·
The headline makes it sound like the theory was refuted, but the abstract instead makes it sound like the evidence that we have has been called into question. S
by kibwen 4y ago
The headline makes it sound like the theory was refuted, but the abstract instead makes it sound like the evidence that we have has been called into question. So it's not that anything has been disproven, it's just that we no longer trust the evidence we have.
- mkl 4y agoHas the headline changed? It's currently "Wild macaques challenge the origin of intentional tool production", which doesn't imply anything is disproven, just that evidence is called into question.