7 ms·
Except these are all proprietary AWS things, with perhaps the aside of “S3 is well supported elsewhere”. Why would someone want to do that to themselves, especi
by nullfield 4y ago
Except these are all proprietary AWS things, with perhaps the aside of “S3 is well supported elsewhere”. Why would someone want to do that to themselves, especially with how tightly coupled that makes things?
I don’t view AWS as a replacement for PHP-like stacks at all.
- muzani 4y agoWhat's the alternative to proprietary AWS? 000webhost? Buy your own server and own it all? Web3?
- phiy 4y agoCloudflare has both static hosting + CDN. There are dozens of CDNs and hundreds of static hosts that you could combine. GCP, Azure also exist with similar solutions
- muzani 4y agoI mean, whatever the problem with proprietary AWS, it seems like it would be the case with GCP, Azure, Cloudflare. I don't really see the benefits of putting eggs in multiple baskets. If one basket is down (e.g. images) the site is practically down in many cases. Plus you have to deal with fragmented billing, etc.
- satvikpendem 4y agoHow are Cloudflare, GCP and Azure any less proprietary than AWS?