> and it may be against their contracts Those contracts are with a company that doesn’t exist anymore… so I’m not sure that’s a good argument. I get that this

> and it may be against their contracts Those contracts are with a company that doesn’t exist anymore… so I’m not sure that’s a good argument. I get that this is part of the compensation that people rely on (I’ve seen Christmas Vacation), but it’s a really bad look. Paying out bonuses right before your company is taken over by the Feds is a horrible PR image. Regardless of if it is the right thing to do or not.