4 ms·
I don’t follow. You’re responding to a point about the author not being a climate change denialist by saying that he doesn’t think action against climate change
by omginternets 4y ago
I don’t follow. You’re responding to a point about the author not being a climate change denialist by saying that he doesn’t think action against climate change is justified.
What point are you actually trying to make? It seems like you’re trying to equate one with the other, especially given your novel use of the word “denialism”. I don’t want to put words in your mouth, but I’m still unclear on what exactly you are implying.
- wizofaus 4y agoI just got the impression the OP wasn't aware of Pielke Jr's background. Actually he's probably better described as a contrarian than a denialist, though he's been called out by no less than Michael Mann as belonging to the latter camp.
- omginternets 4y agoFair. Thanks for clarifying.