4 ms·
If you want a ramdisk maybe look into these: https://ddramdisk.store/2023/02/15/the-ddr4-pcie-x8-lady-successfully-tested/ https://ddramdisk.store/2023/02/15/th
by consp 4y ago
If you want a ramdisk maybe look into these: https://ddramdisk.store/2023/02/15/the-ddr4-pcie-x8-lady-successfully-tested/ https://ddramdisk.store/2023/02/15/the-ddr4-pcie-x8-lady-suc...
I'm not in anyway connected to this, found it after looking for something modern after seeing a YouTube video about old ramdisks.
- 13of40 4y agoDidn't there used to be a version of this that was RAM plus a mechanical hard disk it would get dumped to when powered down? ("hybrid hard disk" seems to mean SSD+Mechanical now.)
- consp 4y agoI don't know. Only ever heard about the OP's thing with compact flash. But since cf is IDE I guess you can use spinning rust as well.
- lmz 4y agoPowering a mechanical hard drive on an emergency battery seems hard. I know RAID cards have battery backed write caches that either store in RAM or flush to flash storage on power outage, and then rewrite when power is back on.
- JoshTriplett 4y agoI can understand why, historically, it made sense to have something that looks like a hardware disk but uses RAM. But today, what's the use case for this, versus just adding the RAM to the system directly and using a software RAM disk? That avoids the disk protocol entirely, and should provide substantially better performance.
- compsciphd 4y agoI believe this is battery backed, so it doesn't lose data when powered off. With that said, mmap hard disk file would get similar performance (minus fsync overhead to the persistent disk backing store).
- 13of40 4y agoAny idea how this compares to enabling write caching on a drive or on your database layer, if you're using one? I mean other than the catastrophic effects of a sudden power outage.
- DominoTree 4y agoI'd think the main benefit these days might be cost savings from using RAM that's a generation or two older, but in general I think the use case for these hardware RAM disks is probably pretty slim nowadays.
- convery 4y agoEven with older RAM, if you need a large and fast storage, few solutions can compete with RAM. Especially when it comes to random R/W. You can get 4.4GBps random read from a DDR3 drive (in parents link) while the latest Gen5 NVME drives tend to cap out at ~90MBps for such loads (worst kind of loads). In addition these can be installed into any system, no need for a special server MOBO with enough RAM slots.
- oso2k 4y agoWhat poor NVMe are you buying that gets 90MB/s? Even the Gen3 Kingston 256MB drive I have does well over 500MB/s in my iozone tests on a Dell Precision 3420. The only time you need mobo support is if you want to boot off NVMe but every PCI-compliant OS should be able to at least see it.
- nayuki 4y ago> the latest Gen5 NVME drives tend to cap out at ~90MBps for such loads (worst kind of loads) Possibly scattered 1-byte writes rather than sequential 4096-byte page writes.
- convery 4y agoBenchmark in English here: https://www.storagereview.com/news/gigabyte-aorus-10000-gen5-ssd-announced https://www.storagereview.com/news/gigabyte-aorus-10000-gen5...
- cm2187 4y agoWould it be better to user DDR3, or anything you can buy for cheap on ebay? You won't use the full speed of the RAM anyway, so why use those older RAM modules that would go to waste anyway.
- rasz 4y agoIts a russian website and afaik everything was always "out of stock". "prices" wouldnt even cover cost of FPGA fast enough. Oh and they already "made" DDR3 board that looks the same, but never sold anything https://web.archive.org/web/20210714152011/https://ddramdisk.tech/ https://web.archive.org/web/20210714152011/https://ddramdisk...