4 ms·
And another reason why I think residential solar is so key, right now it takes a backseat in policy to gridscale, which ... ok the US has a lot of land (alleged
by AtlasBarfed 4y ago
And another reason why I think residential solar is so key, right now it takes a backseat in policy to gridscale, which ... ok the US has a lot of land (allegedly), but using commercial roofs and parking lots is a lot closer to residential solar issues than gridscale in the middle of nowhere: there's a lot of variety in geometry, installation headaches, hookups, distributed management, repair.
Ultimately it means more jobs, more civilization resiliency in disasters, and a "democraticization" of energy generation, which I think the elite REALLY don't want.
It's a thing that economic development basically follows energy production. Central control of economic development (which is what we have with cartel megacorps) wants centralized control of energy production.
Solar isn't just a good carbon policy, or a path to cheaper better energy, or better insurance/life in unstable grids. Home solar is an improvement to individual or small-group liberty.
- no_wizard 4y agoIt’s not some “elite” cabal. It’s transparently the utility companies and adjacent industries. They fight this unless subsidies for their “increased costs to the grid” are covered. It seems in local areas I’ve seen this play out it always comes down to the fact they want the public to pay for the grid upgrades they should’ve been doing in the first place. I think from what I’ve read online and heard from others this is a pretty common if not nearly universal thing happening when it comes to the pushback against rolling out residential / urban solar at scale