4 ms·
I spent six years with an entry-level pentium CPU (G4400) in my main (and often only) computer. I also did not use a SSD. It really did make me appreciate pro
by precompute 4y ago
I spent six years with an entry-level pentium CPU (G4400) in my main (and often only) computer. I also did not use a SSD. It really did make me appreciate programs that make do with less. Moving to a 6C/12T Ryzen with a SSD was amazing, I couldn't believe how quick everything was. Even invoking thunar was appreciably faster, I had no idea I'd been using a "slow" system before.
The Pentium went through a lot; I threw everything I was interested in as a student at it. It even did some 24+ hour encoding jobs, some NN training and some Wii emulation and Wine gaming. Moving to a faster computer with a SSD only really sped up the gaming parts. 95% of my time is spent in my text editor / browser / terminal, and they only really benefit from the SSD, not from higher clock speeds / more cores. Compiling software is much faster, but I don't do it often enough with programs large enough for it to matter.
My desktop never did overheat, though. My laptop doesn't go under 50C without an external cooler.
Hardware support for video codecs is a good reason to upgrade.
- xjia 4y agoBrowser rendering should benefit from better CPU or GPU. And if you use VS Code as editor then that's essentially a browser-based workload as well.
- precompute 4y agoValid point. I went from using Palemoon to using FF right about when I switched computers, so nothing much changed, except I could play 1440p videos without stutter and could actually load some major websites. No role for VSCode because I use Emacs :).