You said "What about all the people who lost what to them was a lot of money in 2008, did the Gov protect them? I do not think so." My claim is that the bank a

You said "What about all the people who lost what to them was a lot of money in 2008, did the Gov protect them? I do not think so." My claim is that the bank accounts of regular people in 2008 were in fact protected, since anything under $250K is automatically protected, in exactly the same way proposed here. Investors certainly lost a lot of money in 2008. And investors in this bank will lose all their money too, since bailing out the bank's investors, or the bank as a business, is not being proposed by anyone.