3 ms·
Thirty deaths from car crashes nationwide over ten years isn't a scale that warrants such things, IMO. There are lots of things that serve no unique functional
by gameman144 4y ago
Thirty deaths from car crashes nationwide over ten years isn't a scale that warrants such things, IMO.
There are lots of things that serve no unique functional purpose that we still love and that still increase death rates (e.g. marathons, hamburgers, skiing).
Having risk doesn't mean that we automatically shouldn't do something.
- falcolas 4y agoIt's not just the 30 additional car deaths (backed up by a large number of non-fatal incidents). https://aasm.org/sleep-experts-want-to-stop-springing-forward-to-daylight-saving-time/ https://aasm.org/sleep-experts-want-to-stop-springing-forwar... https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(19)31678-1?_returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS0960982219316781%3Fshowall%3Dtrue https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(19)... And having risk also doesn't automatically mean that we should sit on our thumbs and go "there's nothing we can do, not enough people are dying from it yet!"