3 ms·
> which makes me believe they must not have known that earlier. But why not? The evidence that was presented to the court was the complainant's evidence. The c
by denton-scratch 4y ago
> which makes me believe they must not have known that earlier.
But why not? The evidence that was presented to the court was the complainant's evidence. The case failed on the prosecution evidence. The prosecutor should have known it wouldn't stand up.
- Natsu 4y agoI mean, you're right that there's a good case that they should have known if they'd done things more thoroughly, but the fact that they simply did fold tells me they probably didn't actually know (even if they really should have!) because otherwise, why embarrass yourself in court like that?