3 ms·
> However, they are wrong about the detail being gone in the gaussian-blurred image. Well yes, but he also downsampled the image to 170x170. As far as I know,
by raincole 4y ago
> However, they are wrong about the detail being gone in the gaussian-blurred image.
Well yes, but he also downsampled the image to 170x170. As far as I know, downsampled information is strictly lost, and unrecoverable without an external information source (like an AI model trained with pictures of moon).
- drhagen 4y agoI'm too lazy to downscale it myself, so here's a 180x180 picture of the moon from WP [1]. This looks about the same as the Samsung result [2]. They are not getting the original detail, but they are getting the detail they should expect if Samsung simply deconvolved the blurred image. [1] https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/2b/Lune-Nikon-600-F4_Luc_Viatour.jpg/180px-Lune-Nikon-600-F4_Luc_Viatour.jpg https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/2b/Lu... [2] https://imgur.com/bXJOZgI https://imgur.com/bXJOZgI