3 ms·
> Demand deposit holders getting wiped out is unthinkable. Taking any non-negligible haircut on their demand deposits (yes, even over $250k) will destroy confid
by kilburn 4y ago
> Demand deposit holders getting wiped out is unthinkable. Taking any non-negligible haircut on their demand deposits (yes, even over $250k) will destroy confidence in the banking industry. This is far worse than the moral hazard of a bailout.
Says who? 2/3 of amercians live paycheck-to-paycheck [1]. The only thing that a banking system has to provide them is day-to-day operations plus a small cushion (much smaller than 250k).
For that people accumulating over 250k is a privilege, one thay may as well come with the risk of getting it wiped out in very rare events such as this one.
[1] https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/23-of-the-us-population-now-lives-paycheck-to-paycheck-301536811.html https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/23-of-the-us-popula...
> yet tons of people think this is "socializing losses and privatizing gains."
Think about the 2/3rds of americans above. Why shouldn't they think that?
- icelancer 4y ago> Think about the 2/3rds of americans above. Why shouldn't they think that? Because: > 2/3 of amercians live paycheck-to-paycheck [1]. Their paychecks are drawn from these demand deposit accounts. This money above $250k is not being stored in an account like Scrooge McDuck just trying to get the highest score. This money is being held in a transitive fashion to pay employees, vendors, and lines of credit. This is what people are not understanding.