3 ms·
> SVB probably would not have collapsed Probably is doing a lot of heavy lifting without telling how? Because in the first paragraph, Levine himself says SVB w
by ignoramous 4y ago
> SVB probably would not have collapsed
Probably is doing a lot of heavy lifting without telling how? Because in the first paragraph, Levine himself says SVB wasn't diversified or large enough to make it through £16b write down on their HTM investments: https://twitter.com/RagingVentures/status/1633579167529725956 https://twitter.com/RagingVentures/status/163357916752972595...
- FiberBundle 4y agoThat was still part of the Levine quote. He references [1] in the footnote as an argument for that claim. [1] https://archive.ph/gmJxU https://archive.ph/gmJxU