So, I'm going to go ahead and assume you are indeed on the spectrum at this point. Not that it matters. But once again you just parrot a point back at me lol.

So, I'm going to go ahead and assume you are indeed on the spectrum at this point. Not that it matters. But once again you just parrot a point back at me lol. > That short code example LCOKS DOWN A COMPLEX THIRD PARTY PROGRAM. The fact that you haven't understood this shows that you're not understanding the discussion. It doesn't do a fucking thing to lock down Oracle you absolute twit. Oracle won't even start if you try to limit it as though it were Chrome. Why is it somehow not in the least bit surprising that you a) think that would work and b) think it's a viable solution. Sigh. This is honestly so fucking stupid. Pledge can ONLY restrict a program to the syscalls it needs. If the program needs syscalls which can be used to leverage an escape or escalation, pledge is fucking useless. SELinux doesn't have that weakness. That you don't understand this fundamental difference shows you're out of your depth, and that as suspected you're a waste of time to try and educate. I'm not going to reply to you again given how technically illiterate you are in this context. Given how insecure and religious towards OpenBSD you seem to be, I'm assuming you're going to need to have the last word, and likely will yet again just parrot back a paraphrased version of one of my replies to you...yet again demonstrating your lack of originality or comprehension. Have fun with that, and I hope having the last word gives you that little boost of self-confidence you seem to be craving to compensate for your clear lack of knowledge. Best of luck to you in life. You need it.