4 ms·
> Where are the jokes that most people aren't much more than copy/paste, or LLM. We have essentially built a computer-based replica of our internal language en
by nico 4y ago
> Where are the jokes that most people aren't much more than copy/paste, or LLM.
We have essentially built a computer-based replica of our internal language engine.
The goal was always to mirror ourselves.
So the other side of the above statement could be: “oh wow, LLMs are just like us”.
We should be very impressed instead of dismissive.
At the same time, maybe yes, our language capabilities can be completely imitated by LLMs.
What do we do now?
- itisit 4y ago> We have essentially built a computer-based replica of our internal language engine. How can we honestly say that’s the case when we cannot explain (or define) our “internal language engine”?
- nico 4y agoNot being able to explain it doesn’t prevent us from trying to copy it. We cannot explain other people, but we imitate them. Kids learn a lot of stuff by imitating. It’s a basic human function. So essentially we created systems that we cannot fully explain, to imitate our own systems that we can’t fully explain either.
- FrustratedMonky 4y agoIsn't that why this original study of the post was about. Imaging of the brain to see, it looks a lot like an LLM. Might be very early, but still intriguing. And is exactly that explaining the "internal language engine".
- __MatrixMan__ 4y agoFully automated luxury gay space communism? Seems like a good a goal as any.