3 ms·
> according to the objective video evidence, they drive dangerously near the children as a way to protest their presence and express their discontent. They sho
by dustfinger 4y ago
> according to the objective video evidence, they drive dangerously near the children as a way to protest their presence and express their discontent.
They should countersue for that!
- hinata08 4y agoMore like >[3] To most, this scene represents a blissful snapshot of a suburban utopia. Peaceful, friendly community life. [4] Yet, to the complainant and his family, this is an unbearable nuisance. An affront on many levels. So much so, that according to the objective video evidence, they drive dangerously near the children as a way to protest their presence and express their discontent.[..] it reminds me of South Park, the episode where they go to Canada. Everyone : " Welcomes friends to Canada Canada friends loves you " Scott : "What the hell is going on ?" Everyone (screaming and running away) : Scott ! It's Scott ! When you reach this level of being ridiculed on worldwide news, you don't need to be sued. Counter-suing Scott would be like shooting at the ambulance !