3 ms·
This article is a word salad. The headline is not supported by evidence and looks like a causal fallacy. The outcome can be explained by the archetype of too m
by protastus 4y ago
This article is a word salad. The headline is not supported by evidence and looks like a causal fallacy.
The outcome can be explained by the archetype of too much money, large company politics, leadership that lacks understanding of the problem space, the Peter principle and the innovator's dilemma.