> Looks like #2 Wow, this appears to be the case, at least judging from the timestamp on the first reference I could find: https://twitter.com/livemint/status/

> Looks like #2 Wow, this appears to be the case, at least judging from the timestamp on the first reference I could find: https://twitter.com/livemint/status/1634091187442266112 https://twitter.com/livemint/status/1634091187442266112 That's massive journalistic malpractice!