4 ms·
Lol. There was so much more to this. The cops had informants. They had undercover people. They were also chatting with the protest leadership about how a sm
by sandworm101 4y ago
Lol. There was so much more to this. The cops had informants. They had undercover people. They were also chatting with the protest leadership about how a small number of dangerous people had "infiltrated" the protest movement. And, in the end, the cops seem to have been correct in their suspicions. The investigation isolated and arrested a very small number of people not for carrying weapons but for organizing to kill people. Few if any legitimate protesters were punished for anything. The events at Coutts seems to be a case of canada's police system working well in a unusual situation.
From the article above: "Protest organizer Marco Van Huigenbos said the protest was "infiltrated by an extreme element" and a decision was made for the remaining group to roll out from Coutts on Tuesday morning."
- username71 4y agoCool story bro! Now demonstration is a fundamental right, and privacy is a fundamental right too. And no circumstance allows the police violating these rights, no matter how right wing they are, and how fuked up your brain is.
- uoaei 4y agoGreen, generic username... obviously a fluffy troll. Disengage and move on, folks. For the record, there's a reason the 5th Amendment exists and is replicated in other countries' legal systems.