3 ms·
I believe the implication is: why aren't we using the fed for our banking, this kind of bank run would be impossible. The fed provides guarantees to banks but n
by brian_cloutier 4y ago
I believe the implication is: why aren't we using the fed for our banking, this kind of bank run would be impossible. The fed provides guarantees to banks but not to retail and that's a policy decision we could change, if we wanted to.
- nebulousthree 4y agoTry selling socialism to Americans...that's why.
- whitemary 4y ago> The fed provides guarantees to banks but not to retail and that's a policy decision we could change, if we wanted to. Who is "we?" The US is not a democracy. Nothing could stop US elites from overturning the Bretton Woods system, passing NAFTA, and bailing out the banks in the mortgage crisis, so what makes you think "we" could change this policy decision? Karl Marx showed us how capitalism works 150 years ago. The ruling class rules and the working class works. If you don't like it, you need to move beyond capitalism.
- pbronez 4y agoWe're making some progress in that direction. The FedNow program will provide retail money transfer services [0]. This should make it much more practical to do direct stimulus efforts like we saw during COVID. [0] https://www.frbservices.org/financial-services/fednow/about.html https://www.frbservices.org/financial-services/fednow/about....