>> If Windows Server was free, what is it missing as compared to Arch, Red Hat, or Debian Linux that would keep you from using it? What does Windows Server off

>> If Windows Server was free, what is it missing as compared to Arch, Red Hat, or Debian Linux that would keep you from using it? What does Windows Server offer that is better than a Linux server? I can download and install a variety of Linux servers now. There are tons of free software that I can install and use or modify for any task I can think of. I can't think of any reason to use a Windows Server, free or otherwise.