This counterargument has flaws of its own, like no working definition of "things [that] do make you weaker". It seems like hearsay from both sides. I think th

This counterargument has flaws of its own, like no working definition of "things [that] do make you weaker". It seems like hearsay from both sides. I think the only time-tested truth, backed up by wealth of data, is that censorship of ideas and speech is bad, especially in academic settings. This counterargument needs to have some more rigorous lemmas and data to back them up.