4 ms·
Interesting. Looking at their website, I don’t get how SVB was supposed to work. Retail and commercial banks (as opposed to investment banks) make almost all th
by stephen_g 4y ago
Interesting. Looking at their website, I don’t get how SVB was supposed to work. Retail and commercial banks (as opposed to investment banks) make almost all their money from lending, especially against fairly safe assets like real-estate, but SVB doesn’t seem to have a lot of those kind of lending products advertised. Successful banks have deposits just because they need the transfers coming in to keep up liquidity in the payment system, and because they’re involved in the mechanics of lending (actually created as part of lending, not actually “lent out” themselves). But they generally don’t actually make any serious money from having deposits themselves (because there’s no good way to do that in a way that is risk-free enough)…
The lending keeps money coming in (repayments), makes money (interest), etc. - so how was SVB supposed to make money and maintain liquidity without much of that?
- cft 4y agoThey did bridge loans back in the day: you are running out of cash but it's fairly certain you are getting the next capital round, and that loan was secured by a special class of shares that they could either sell at the next round or keep
- donedealomg 4y ago[dead]