3 ms·
I'm not sure that would be worse than the capital driven land-lord situation. I mean, in terms of renting out a house from a former employee until real estate
by tracker1 4y ago
I'm not sure that would be worse than the capital driven land-lord situation. I mean, in terms of renting out a house from a former employee until real estate improves enough to sell. Odds are it would be done via the same rental mgt companies that everyone else uses anyway.
At least as long as the company isn't pushing to keep said properties longer than necessary.
- ibejoeb 4y agoIt's "fine" as long as the employee isn't paying rent to the employer. There's just way to much risk of things going straight to hell.
- tracker1 4y agoYeah, that is generally bad. While it may be legal, I think it's entirely unethical to have conflicting interests at play in a business. Part of why I hate that Sony, for example, controls both the tech (Bluray, hardware, etc) and media investments. Or insurance providers owning stakes in pharma.