It’s ironic that HN commentary is so much like LLM output: usually very good, always authoritative, sometimes wildly wrong. And when I see the wildly wrong stu

It’s ironic that HN commentary is so much like LLM output: usually very good, always authoritative, sometimes wildly wrong. And when I see the wildly wrong stuff it makes me wonder how many seemingly knowledgeable comments were also wrong, just convincing. I think a lot of the negativity towards LLMs is because they turn a mirror to our own fallibility in facts and tone.