3 ms·
I don’t think you’re using conflict of interest correctly. You’re saying here the author has secondary motives, such as being sponsored by an anti-weed org or s
by SamoyedFurFluff 4y ago
I don’t think you’re using conflict of interest correctly. You’re saying here the author has secondary motives, such as being sponsored by an anti-weed org or something, which they would have to disclose in their own section (as per basic academic standards).
You might want to instead if you want to criticize the research say the authors clearly have a personal agenda or bias.
- edgyquant 4y agoThis is par for the course. When anyone suggests that weed may not be beneficial to your health people who consume it tend to get very defensive.
- varispeed 4y agoIt is common for people working with addiction to demonise drugs, so that they can have stream of scared patients lined up.
- starkd 4y agoI don't think they have any shortage of patients in rehab. There is already a steady stream of them. Rehab counselors are often former addicts just trying to help others live through what they did. It is not exactly a way to get rich.