3 ms·
I think at the very least this is going to lead to some major changes in UI design, but first they need to reel it in and get it under control instead of traini
by snickerbockers 4y ago
I think at the very least this is going to lead to some major changes in UI design, but first they need to reel it in and get it under control instead of training it off of Reddit posts and then making a surprise pikachu face when it turns out to be an arrogant cunt.
But it's definitely not going to go nearly as far as people are predicting. The more i use it the more it becomes apparent to me that there's no real intelligence behind it, just large-scale pattern recognition that makes it seem real because I'm not intelligent enough to comprehend the patterns.
- dmix 4y ago> apparent to me that there's no real intelligence behind it Does it even need to be to be useful? A ChatGPT that is legitimately "intelligent" would basically be the El Dorado of tech. There's plenty of value between here and there. The big issue IMO is people are going to Chatgpt's website explicitly and having certain high expectations. Or they use it via Bing expecting it to be a search engine answer machine. Once such an interface is more directly integrated into our lives in a clean way where people understand what it is and what the limitations are it could easily be an app that basically everyone has installed, but more like a super-useful tool like Google Maps rather than replacing Google. That's still a big business and major development for the industry. And even if the consumer daily-used mobile app thing or some high-visibility Google integration turns out to be less interesting/useful than predicted, there's still a million niche business and hobby usecases.
- wpietri 4y agoI just want to take a moment to appreciate the poetry of this: > training it off of Reddit posts and then making a surprise pikachu face when it turns out to be an arrogant cunt