3 ms·
I’m not sure why GP used the minus operator - I omitted that part and still got results about usage and not emissions.
by yunohn 4y ago
I’m not sure why GP used the minus operator - I omitted that part and still got results about usage and not emissions.
- fock 4y agoI want to get statistics and numbers. I'm aware of the applications. GPs suggestions didn't really help me either.
- mtlmtlmtlmtl 4y agoDid another search for "industrial consumption of CO2", again without the quotes, and found this: https://www.iea.org/reports/putting-co2-to-use https://www.iea.org/reports/putting-co2-to-use Sure this talks a lot about emissions, but it also seems to include a detailed breakdown of various industrial uses for CO2, with numbers, projections, statistics and all.
- yunohn 4y agohttps://www.iea.org/reports/putting-co2-to-use https://www.iea.org/reports/putting-co2-to-use First result for “co2 industrial usage numbers”, without quotes - just like the sibling comment. You need to specify atleast a few keywords to clarify what you’re looking for - search engine nor llm chatbot nor HN commenters can read your mind…
- mtlmtlmtlmtl 4y agoSpecifically because they said they only found stuff on emissions. Never tried it without. It's one of the most common patterns I come across. I search word X but find a bunch of word Y stuff that's not what I'm looking for, because word X and Y appear together a lot in Y's context. So I add -Y to the query.