2 ms·
No it’s just that an image can’t be “false” or “grammatically incorrect”. Anything recognizable can make a satisfying image and people don’t seem too bothered
by colechristensen 4y ago
No it’s just that an image can’t be “false” or “grammatically incorrect”. Anything recognizable can make a satisfying image and people don’t seem too bothered by the kinds of mistakes image generators make.
Text generated though we want not to be just a pile of recognizable words but to follow some pretty strict rules and to actually be true.
Imagine you insisted stablediffusion only produce photorealistic images and judged it for every inaccuracy.
- swatcoder 4y agoThat’s exactly what I said. We have those words (false, grammatically incorrect, etc) because we have a more particular sense of language and identify more nuance in how language fails for us than how images fail for us.
- hgsgm 4y agoIt's more that nonsensical language is meaningless, because language has so little content density to begin with, so losing a little loses almost all of it, whereas a mishmashy picture has lots of pieces of meaning, even if the whole is a mess, because images are far more information dense.