> Americans are Americans because we believe (or should. Do you?) in the Constitution and the rule of law. I'm not American. But that's not the citizenship con

> Americans are Americans because we believe (or should. Do you?) in the Constitution and the rule of law. I'm not American. But that's not the citizenship condition your founding fathers passed. It's not even the citizenship condition today. > And which "minority" are you talking about? It doesn't matter - all of them living in the US (or any other country) will be subject to the same sub-replacement conditions I argue are harmful to a nation, in the sense that a nation is not just the legal and ideological system, but also people. > "White" isn't an ethnicity or a separate grouping. Rather it's just a specific genetic adaptation to colder climates in the amount of melanin in the skin. You're saying human groups were separate long enough to develop different adaptations to the climate.. but no other adaptations? Despite your claim about how similar we all are, genetic tests easily determine geographic ancestry, as a PCA plot of genetic diversity shows [1]. The claim that we are more similar rests on single-gene variation, which is a meaningless test, since nearly all traits are polygenic. Even your claim about Neanderthal genes is wrong - sub-Saharan Africans don't have them. And Scientific American has admitted to putting political goals ahead of science [2], so their credibility in this area is nil. [1] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:3D_PCA_plot_of_Xavante.png https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:3D_PCA_plot_of_Xavan... [2] https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/science-must-not-be-used-to-foster-white-supremacy/ https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/science-must-not-...