4 ms·
Every way you just mentioned seems to depend on a layer of managers assessing things? I ask that because I've observed in both deeply hierarchical (and dysfunc
by jjtheblunt 4y ago
Every way you just mentioned seems to depend on a layer of managers assessing things?
I ask that because I've observed in both deeply hierarchical (and dysfunctional as all hell) Amazon, and super flat (at least for a long time) Apple, and your characterizations only fit the bureaucracies. (I've observed the same at other places as well.)
- clnq 4y agoYou bring up an interesting point. I have not seen this in flat or small companies as I have not worked in many. But I imagine that those surrounding the engineer will still feel that their expectations are no longer met if the engineer tries to return to normality from their superhero role. Though perhaps the colleagues might understand the full circumstances of the situation better in a tighter or less hierarchical team. Ultimately, if someone has the engineer's back when they need to stop being the proverbial "Atlas who holds up the world", then maybe things could end better. But there are few managers that have the insight to notice it and grace to do something about it. The kind manager (or colleague) described in the article we are discussing is not common. So whatever the circumstances, generally it does end badly if the engineer significantly over-commits to save the project.
- jjtheblunt 4y agoTrue