3 ms·
> You can choose to not give away your data by not using those services. This is just plain wrong. There are privacy violating services where people are not gi
by autoexec 4y ago
> You can choose to not give away your data by not using those services.
This is just plain wrong. There are privacy violating services where people are not given a choice. I don't have a Facebook account, but they bought tons of data about me from brokers and used to it to create a shadow profile that they continuously update using any scrap of information on me that they can find including what they can get out of the conversations held by my friends and family members who do have facebook accounts. What choice did I have in any of that?
Critical services and even government websites force you to hand information over to privacy hostile companies.
You can't even go to irs.gov without pinging Google's servers, allowing them to collect data on you. Sorry, but "never use the internet again" isn't really a viable option and as long as you use the internet your data will be taken from you without your consent, or even your awareness. Choice, isn't really a factor.
- landemva 4y agoTo your point on family ties, potential DNA matching between relatives will not be avoidable. I wonder if there could be a constitutional amendment to protect us.
- autoexec 4y agoIt's what we need, but it'd be a hard sell. The government loves being able to take all this data, even our DNA. (https://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/02/04/baby.dna.government/index.html https://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/02/04/baby.dna.government/in... and https://www.aclu.org/other/newborn-dna-banking https://www.aclu.org/other/newborn-dna-banking) What hope do we have of our government protecting us from their own actions?