3 ms·
I also have a different definition of shady than he's using. A setting clearly and prominently described on the options is not shady in by book, regardless of t
by antiframe 4y ago
I also have a different definition of shady than he's using. A setting clearly and prominently described on the options is not shady in by book, regardless of the default.
Would I prefer Firefox had different defaults? Yes. But, I will reserve the word shady for the products actually doing shady things like telemetry in Windows that requires jumping through hoops to turn off.
- account42 4y ago> I also have a different definition of shady than he's using. A setting clearly and prominently described on the options is not shady in by book, regardless of the default. It is shady because new settings appear with updates. Surely you don't expect users to trawl through all settings for each browser update to see if Mozilla didn't sneak anything in there that undoes part of their previous choices?