Every language has idiosyncrasies. The issue with Java is that right off the bat you are presented with bloat. Just to have a main function requires a class (a

Every language has idiosyncrasies. The issue with Java is that right off the bat you are presented with bloat. Just to have a main function requires a class (and people realize this is wrong, which is why Kotlin and Groovy fixed this). Want a build system? You have to learn a whole another language essentially, like ant/maven/or gradle. Want to have logs? You have to use a library that has its own xml configuration files that specify behavior, in their own format. Oh and that library may have glaring vulnerabilities where logging something results in FETCHING CODE FROM THE INTERNET AND EXECUTING IT, BY DESIGN. Same goes for most any other public library that is widely used. Oh and btw, its bad practice in making your class members public, you should make them private. But its also bad practice in writing getters and setters - instead use a library that hacks the AST and writes functions there that are not visible in the code, for which you need special plugins for every IDE to recognize. I honestly don't know how people deal with this and remain so ignorant to it to continue using Java.