3 ms·
So the main opposition to Labour should be dismissed off hand? The conflation of 'the political left's perception of reality' with 'the truth' is outrageous, a
by ETH_start 4y ago
So the main opposition to Labour should be dismissed off hand?
The conflation of 'the political left's perception of reality' with 'the truth' is outrageous, and nothing more than an attempt to delegitimize views that conflict with the political left's agenda, which corresponds with polls showing in the US, registered Democrats are increasingly gravitating toward authoritarianism:
https://rumble.com/vnwyhz-the-mountain-of-data-showing-how-authoritarian-democrats-have-become.html https://rumble.com/vnwyhz-the-mountain-of-data-showing-how-a...
The evidence for harm from lockdowns is at this point overwhelming, but this issue has become so politicized that the worst policy decision perhaps in history is being swept under the rug.
Absent a feasible zero-COVID strategy, which for most countries was never in the books due to their geographical situation, lockdowns have been found to have virtually no impact on reducing the spread of COVID.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13571516.2021.1976051 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13571516.2021.19...
https://sites.krieger.jhu.edu/iae/files/2022/01/A-Literature-Review-and-Meta-Analysis-of-the-Effects-of-Lockdowns-on-COVID-19-Mortality.pdf https://sites.krieger.jhu.edu/iae/files/2022/01/A-Literature...
Lockdowns have devastated education:
https://www.unicef.org/press-releases/schools-more-168-million-children-globally-have-been-completely-closed https://www.unicef.org/press-releases/schools-more-168-milli...
https://www.economist.com/international/2022/07/07/covid-learning-loss-has-been-a-global-disaster https://www.economist.com/international/2022/07/07/covid-lea...
The cost to lifetime earnings is estimated to be $17 trillion:
https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2021/12/06/learning-losses-from-covid-19-could-cost-this-generation-of-students-close-to-17-trillion-in-lifetime-earnings https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2021/12/06/l...
Which will massively exacerbate poverty and all of its associated illnesses.
The education losses have been worst for the poor:
https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2022/05/remote-learning-likely-widened-racial-economic-achievement-gap/ https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2022/05/remote-learni...
Social distancing and other COVID control measures, which became mandatory with lockdowns, have been associated with a surge in childhood obesity:
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7037a3.htm?s_cid=mm7037a3_w https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7037a3.htm?s_cid=mm...
97 million more people are estimated to be in poverty due to the social reaction to COVID, the most drastic and disruptive of which were lockdowns:
https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/updated-estimates-impact-covid-19-global-poverty-turning-corner-pandemic-2021 https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/updated-estimates-impac...
- mmarq 4y agoCriticising the Telegraph has nothing to do with dismissing the opposition to the Labour party. If anybody’s IQ dropped significantly after 2012, it is the target readership of this paper, that went from being a respectable newspaper to a news outlet peddling anti-immigrant, anti-eu and, more recently, anti-lockdown rhetoric. It has become a Daily Mail with slightly less idiotic headlines and more conventional graphics, with a mission to get Johnson back to Number 10. I don’t think it is by chance that they decided to publish Hancock’s irrelevant leaks the day after Sunak solved the problems that Johnson created in Northern Ireland.
- ETH_start 4y ago>>Criticising the Telegraph has nothing to do with dismissing the opposition to the Labour party. The OP specifically mentioned being pro-Tory "a mouth piece for Tory anti-lockdown "reporters" And the fact that you also list a number of Tory positions that they support, including the opposition to lockdowns, as if it's self-evident that holding those positions disqualifies them as a respectable source, is exactly what I'm talking about.
- mmarq 4y agoIt is true that they are a mouth piece for the Tory party, particularly for Boris Johnson. It is also true that they are not a respectable source since at least 2014, when they started publishing idiocies such as: - https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/11599609/Asylum-figures-take-centre-stage-in-new-EU-negotiations.html https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/11599609... - https://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/mayday-i-have-a-crush-on-our-prime-minister--and-im-not-alone/ https://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/mayday-i-have-a... - https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/03/02/watch-eu-vaccine-crisis-showing-others-benefits-brexit/ https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/03/02/watch-eu-vaccine... - https://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/life/brexiteers-can-now-show-remainers-tangible-benefit-leaving-eu/ https://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/life/brexiteers-can-now-sh... Finally, it is also a fact that they are currently a mounth piece for anti-lockdown "reporters". We put that in quotes because (1) none of them would be able to understand any of the random papers they cherrypick and (2) they actively contributed to Johnson's electoral campaign in 2019, knowing that he would make a mess (as he did with lockdowns and covid management).