3 ms·
You are touching on the difference between demand deposits and duration deposits. If you were charged a small nominal fee for your demand deposits, you would l
by recursivedoubts 4y ago
You are touching on the difference between demand deposits and duration deposits.
If you were charged a small nominal fee for your demand deposits, you would likely say "OK, I'll keep a certain amount in my demand deposit account, and then put the stuff I don't need into longer duration deposits, so I can get some interest."
This would be the right thing, and that money could be safely loaned out at durations shorter than you deposited. You would then be signalling to the market exactly what the demand is for money over time, and it could respond appropriately.
To an extent you do this today: you don't keep all your money in demand deposits, you instead put a lot in the market or whatever. Back in the day, you might have even bought a CD, which is almost exactly what I'm describing, sans the requirement that banks not loan funds they can't guarantee are available for the duration of the loan.
So it's not as crazy as it sounds. It's still crazy, but not as crazy as it sounds.
- dev_tty01 4y agoCDs are duration deposits, but you can still get the money out minus some fees associated with the early withdrawal. That doesn't help the run on the bank situation.
- recursivedoubts 4y agoSo long as the bank has reserves (out of profits) they can offer to buy people out early, according to their own profit and loss calculations. But they can't be compelled to, and they must have that money available to them at the given moment. In this make believe banking system that I am making up. :)