Of course, as I posted elsewhere in this thread: > (Nb. this doesn't necessarily mean that the proposed reforms aren't a good idea) The study just seems to be

Of course, as I posted elsewhere in this thread: > (Nb. this doesn't necessarily mean that the proposed reforms aren't a good idea) The study just seems to be... kinda useless, due to how poorly it's designed, and the study's what's linked (well, a press-release-type story about the study, anyway). But yes, reducing shitty behavior is nice for ~everyone even if 0% of it turns out to be driven by sexism (which I doubt is the case, but taking the extreme emphasizes that it's good absolutely). However, the most-effective approaches to reducing it may well differ depending on how much of it's driven by sexism, about which this study seems to tell us nothing, despite that sure looking like the angle they're going for.