This isn't an article about how crazy wildfires are, it's about the effect on the ozone layer, so not sure why any of that would be relevant. If the objection

This isn't an article about how crazy wildfires are, it's about the effect on the ozone layer, so not sure why any of that would be relevant. If the objection is that the lead author used the term "climate change" out loud, the article seems to go out of its way to be precise so the "any mention of climate change is political" crowd won't be aroused: > Haywood would like to see the new chemistry integrated into a climate model to forecast how ozone depletion might be affected if intense wildfires become more common.