3 ms·
Interesting. In your opinion, how should we decide when we're close enough that we're talking about something concrete?
by JohnPrine 4y ago
Interesting. In your opinion, how should we decide when we're close enough that we're talking about something concrete?
- ElfinTrousers 4y agoPlease see second asterisked point above.
- JohnPrine 4y agoYou seem to agree that if at some point in the next few decades AI will be something we need to worry about, so I'm trying to figure out exactly what it is you oppose. Would you have opposed research into renewable energy in the 1970s since global warming was still a few decades away from being something we needed to worry about?
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- ElfinTrousers 4y ago> You seem to agree that if at some point in the next few decades AI will be something we need to worry about If you think this than you have misunderstood me. Now go elsewhere and bother other people.
- JohnPrine 4y agoI'm not trying to bother you. I'm genuinely curious about what makes people oppose AI safety research. What makes you sure it's not going to be a problem?
- ElfinTrousers 4y ago> I'm not trying to bother you. Your intent is irrelevant.
- JohnPrine 4y agoWhy are you bothered by a simple line of follow up questions about a belief you expressed publicly?