4 ms·
Isn't this a red herrring? I thought the law didn't require the removal of E2E encryption, but rather mandated the addition of a back door that submits some ki
by yosser 4y ago
Isn't this a red herrring? I thought the law didn't require the removal of E2E encryption, but rather mandated the addition of a back door that submits some kind of meta data summary to a third party service?
- developer93 4y agoIs that better? The effect is the same.
- spoiler 4y agoI think they meant to say that this is just a PR stunt by saying they won't remove encryption (because they don't even need to to comply)
- 29083011397778 4y agoThat depends entirely upon who gets to define "End-to-end", and whether they are held to task for any inaccuracies in that definition
- FalconSensei 4y agois it truly E2E encryption if it has a backdoor?
- m463 4y agowhatsapp has that.