> Wonder how foolproof/incorruptible the chain of custody is supposed to be for the provided data? Not enough any prosecutor would prosecute someone based on t

> Wonder how foolproof/incorruptible the chain of custody is supposed to be for the provided data? Not enough any prosecutor would prosecute someone based on that data alone. However, I do see a case where the data provided could be used to further an investigation. And in some ways, that makes sense. The data is a clue, but it's not what is going to put someone away. It's a log entry. A log entry is only as good as your logs and provides a clue for further investigation, but it's not where you stop the investigation. I'm not commenting on the legality or whether access to this data is right, merely my assumptions on how this data could be useful in one aspect that doesn't necessarily need it to be foolproof or incorruptible.