I legitimately scrolled to the top of the post and scrolled back down because I assumed I had missed most of it. The author lists four of Chomsky's points, rebu

I legitimately scrolled to the top of the post and scrolled back down because I assumed I had missed most of it. The author lists four of Chomsky's points, rebuts only the fourth by saying it was intentional, then insults Chomsky with a vague analogy that could apply to anyone engaged in a scientific debate. Regardless of my stance on the issues this post doesn't seem that good to me.