5 ms·
The simple fact that a LLM is trained on a gigantic corpus of data and humans learn from a relatively tiny number of interactions with other humans shows that t
by zorked 4y ago
The simple fact that a LLM is trained on a gigantic corpus of data and humans learn from a relatively tiny number of interactions with other humans shows that they obviously learn differently.
- AstixAndBelix 4y ago>humans learn from a relatively tiny number of interactions with other humans but those interactions are infinitely complex and contain an enormous amount of data
- genman 4y agoAnd children are really stupid until they have been exposed to even larger amount of data.
- HDThoreaun 4y agoOr that brains have more processing power or a subtly different architecture than current LLMs
- AndrewPGameDev 4y agoIf we took all of the data that a human takes in from all of their senses, I'm not sure if humans use less data. Humans take in 10 million bits[1] from their eyes every second. 10,000,000 bits/sec * 60 secs/min * 60 mins/hour * 24 hours/day * 1000 days = 108 terabytes. ChatGPT only used 570 GB of training data, so 2 orders of magnitude less data, and that's only counting the visual data. edit: And that would be for a 3 year old, so comparing ChatGPT's intelligence to a 3 year old shows that ChatGPT comes out favourably. [1]https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/07/060726180933.htm#:~:text=Summary%3A,similar%20to%20an%20Ethernet%20connection https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/07/060726180933.h....
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]