5 ms·
Wafters spend something like 3 months in continuous processing in a fab. Considering the extreme difficulty of the physics of the task and the scale of investme
by jasonwatkinspdx 4y ago
Wafters spend something like 3 months in continuous processing in a fab. Considering the extreme difficulty of the physics of the task and the scale of investment into fabs where small improvements in speed would be worth billions, I would be very skeptical that any low hanging fruit remain for dramatic shortcuts of the process.
- pjc50 4y agoI think the actual process time is a lot shorter than that, but the dynamics of trying to (1) keep the fab 100% busy and (2) satisfy the most lucrative customers first mean that your job gets done at some point in a 3 month window.
- jasonwatkinspdx 4y agoI am not an EE but my understanding is the time varies a bit based on complexity of the design (ie how many layers) but that even if you're willing to pay a multiple of the basic price the shortest you can expect is 2 months. There's physical steps that simply cannot be sped up more than partial inventory simply sitting around in a queue. Googling real quick agrees with that impression. There's just no way the current approach will get to the days turn around the top comment was betting will happen in a few years. If there was anything even remotely promising that with commercialization in a few years we'd all have heard about it loud and clear. Likewise, the support equipment, the chemicals involved. There's just no chance of current fab tech becoming a 3d printer like table top device. That would require a revolution even bigger than the original chip revolution.
- artemonster 4y agoPlease dont assume, if you dont know. Growing oxide, doping silicon, depositing metal, grinding all take substantial time. Even if you do a magical „no logistics everything in one place machine fab“ it would still be months of non-stop operation to do 200-300 process steps required.
- panick21_ 4y agoI didn't know that, thanks for the information.