While governments in Argentina and other countries might be poorly run and have unstable currencies, that doesn't mean that one should use an even worse system

While governments in Argentina and other countries might be poorly run and have unstable currencies, that doesn't mean that one should use an even worse system that loses people's savings together. The fees on crypto is much higher and is slower than any of the solutions I mentioned when you account for exchange fees, volatility, transfer fees, buy/sell fees, etc. Yes, my two examples exist but are not enough, but combined with other payments systems is used more than those using unsafe, unregulated, volatile crypto tokens that fits an extremely tiny and miniscule niche that only less than 2,000 people like yourself are unfortunately forced to use. When Transfers 3.0 hits critical mass in Argentina and links up with Pix, UPI and other real time payment systems, there wouldn't be a need at all for crypto.