4 ms·
Yes completely agree. But, this car never even pretended to advertise driving itself. Most likely, it advertised plain, vanilla "cruise control." At best, it al
by obblekk 4y ago
Yes completely agree. But, this car never even pretended to advertise driving itself. Most likely, it advertised plain, vanilla "cruise control." At best, it also advertised lane keeping and radar cruise control.
- Alupis 4y agoOk, and that lane assist radar cruise control thingy drove straight into a parked, stationary emergency vehicle and killed it's own occupants. Where is the disconnect happening here? Not driving full-speed into stationary objects strikes me as "Driver Assist 101" stuff...
- imgabe 4y agoIt doesn’t matter what gadgets or gizmos are advertised on the car. You’re still responsible for driving the car. Sitting there waiting for the car to do something while it drives full speed into a stationary object is not the car’s fault. As long as the car still had functioning brakes and steering, this is on the driver.
- 7e 4y agoA driver mislead by, well, lies.
- imgabe 4y agoYour eyes don’t lie. If you’re paying attention like you’re supposed to, you have plenty of time to see any obstacles and take manual control if the car doesn’t slow down like it’s supposed to. People are so desperate to blame literally anything except the person directly responsible.