4 ms·
>And it's not like we have any historical precedence for a police force being different than this either, its just how it always been Policing like we do it to
by dsfyu404ed 4y ago
>And it's not like we have any historical precedence for a police force being different than this either, its just how it always been
Policing like we do it today in the West with state employees going looking for violations of law didn't exist before the surpluses of the industrial revolution enabled the high touch administrative state.
In the 18th and 19th century there were far, far fewer professional local/county "police", many of the duties were performed by other offices/officials and when needed they got their muscle from community volunteers or the state (usually from the national guard or army in the US). Consequently they didn't spend much time enforcing petty civil laws and enforcing social norms because the manpower simply wasn't there and you couldn't afford to piss off the fraction of people such enforcement pisses off.
(Obviously this all varies by country and year so I'm speaking generally)
- mr_toad 4y ago> Policing like we do it today in the West with state employees going looking for violations of law didn't exist before the surpluses of the industrial revolution enabled the high touch administrative state. It often used to be up to the victim to pursue justice. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thief-taker https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thief-taker There are obvious problems with this approach.