3 ms·
Facebook's ongoing record is one of introducing opt-out products that harm user privacy. This is just a matter of preference. Nobody is hurt by SPYW, and it's
by redthrowaway 15y ago
Facebook's ongoing record is one of introducing opt-out products that harm user privacy. This is just a matter of preference. Nobody is hurt by SPYW, and it's far easier to disable than many of facebook's updates.
The issue with Facebook's changes to privacy was not that they are opt-out, but that they were opt-out and significantly impacted user privacy. Opt-out services on their own may be annoying, but they aren't a cause for alarm unless it hurts the user.
- Stormbringer 15y agoGoogle also has an ongoing PR problem with regard to privacy, with Eric Schmidt (sp? the recently ex-ceo dude) going on record as saying he doesn't believe in privacy. Facebook at least pretends to care about privacy and then screws the user, whereas Google just skips to step B
- myko 15y agoGoogle has a team whose job is to make sure privacy needs of the user are met: http://www.dataliberation.org/ http://www.dataliberation.org/
- tedivm 15y agoThe Data Liberation program is all about being able to move your data from google to anywhere else. It has nothing to do with privacy.
- myko 15y agoHow is removing one's data entirely from a product not related to privacy?
- tedivm 15y agoThe data liberation thing is about adding data to Google, or copying the data out of Google so other services can use it. I may be wrong, but I have not seen anything that says you can use it to actually delete the information from Google's servers (if I'm wrong, please show me).