> The aside in the book says the opposite of what you claim it to be saying. Here, you suggest that liberal cloning is the way it should be; there, you say it'

> The aside in the book says the opposite of what you claim it to be saying. Here, you suggest that liberal cloning is the way it should be; there, you say it's fine for beginner code, which is a very unsubtle nudge. Which is it? That's phrased way too harshly, considering you're talking to someone who has put significant efforts into making Rust accessible to others.