4 ms·
I'm not saying it's a bad thing inherently. It makes some degree of sense, but the problem is that there's many countries, usually third world, that sold their
by noirscape 4y ago
I'm not saying it's a bad thing inherently.
It makes some degree of sense, but the problem is that there's many countries, usually third world, that sold their namespace off to a shady registrar like Freenom, usually to either try and give their disastrous economies a financial injection or to line the pockets of some corrupt government official. (Or as is often the case, both at the same time.)
There's no process in place to prevent that sort of thing from happening, and it's ultimately a bad outcome for all involved. It results in the ccTLD of a country with legitimate citizens getting a bad reputation for transmitting unreasonable amounts of spam (since Freenom gives it away to anyone who asks) and it often doesn't fix the economy of said country anyway.
- account42 4y agoCountries selling making bad deals when selling off their resources is of course not a good thing, but I'd rather risk that happening than give the US or any one central entity even more power to dictate who can or cannot have an online presence. At least with domain names the countries in question could technically take the TLD back even if it would be a legal shitstorm - not so much with physical resources that have been removed.